Skip to content
PackRipper

Rip simulator · odds read Oct 8, 2026

DOPA! pack simulator

Open simulated DOPA! packs using the odds it publishes for its Pokémon packs, and see the RTP (return to player: what comes back for every dollar in) before and after a session. Values are DOPA!'s own; nothing here is a real pull.

Set up a session

DOPA! · buyback 100% credit (site credit) · listing

Pack

Packs to open

Expected RTP

Enter a pack price to see the expected RTP.

On some packs the published odds imply an RTP at or above 100%. That is a statement about DOPA!'s own valuations, not market prices, and not an edge: the listing records what users report about its displayed values, and sell-backs take a haircut.

The odds behind this

Transcribed from MUR Fortune Flip!'s page on Oct 8, 2026. Bands and item values are DOPA's own point value per card shown in dollars (100 points = $1; e.g. a card listed at $190.00 carries 19,000 pack points), which is the credit amount DOPA gives when a card is exchanged instead of shipped; the pages do not cite market comps.

BandValueChanceAverage valueShare of EV
$0.8 to $25$0.80 to $2550%$7.037%
$25 to $50$25 to $500%$360%
$50 to $100$50 to $10039%$7258%
$100 to $200$100 to $20011%$14433%
$200 to $300$200 to $3000.1%$2471%
$300 to $1500$300 to $1,5000.06%$7461%

Source: MUR Fortune Flip! on DOPA!. Each pack page prints an 'Odds & Probabilities' grid of six dollar bands with a percentage, a 'Floor value' (the cheapest card in the pack) and a 'Biggest win' multiple, then an 'Inside pack' list of the prize cards (ranks S, A, B) each with its dollar value and its percentage. Packs are finite runs (a stated total, pulled and remaining count), so every percentage is a share of the remaining pool and moves as packs sell; the per-card percentage equals quantity divided by the run size. Only prize cards are itemized; the filler cards that make up most of the pool sit in the lowest band and are not listed, so item lists do not sum to 100. Band edges are multiples of the price (0.5x, 1x, 2x, 3x, 4x, 6x, with the floor as the lower edge) and some packs have gaps between bands as published (e.g. $65 to $70 and $190 to $260 on gacha 4782). Published band totals range from 99.8 to 100.52 because each band is rounded separately. Prices are USD (price_display). All seven packs are Pokémon (Japanese PSA 10 slabs and sealed Japanese product); the One Piece tab was not reachable without the API. Items are captured for three packs (10509, 7327, 13591). Values are DOPA's own point values (100 points = $1). Only the band tables are used here; the per-card lists on three packs don't itemize filler cards, so they're kept in the research capture only. The $0.75 Magikarp Pikachu's Lucky Bag is left out: its top band runs from $4.50 to $17,000 as a catch-all for a 110,000-pull prize pool, which a value-band model can't represent honestly; it stays in the research capture.

How the simulation works

RTP is return to player: value pulled divided by money spent. Each simulated pack draws one value band using the probabilities DOPA! publishes, then a value inside that band. Platforms publish the bands but not where values fall inside them, and that gap matters: a $25 to $200 band averages $70 if values spread log-evenly, $112 if evenly, and less if most cards sit near $25. So the expected RTP is shown as a range from bottom-heavy to evenly spread, and the simulation draws log-evenly in between. Real pulls come from a finite card pool and the platform's pricing can move, so treat every number as an estimate at DOPA!'s own valuations, which may differ from what the same card sells for elsewhere.

DOPA! pays sell-backs in site credit, so value pulled isn't cash you can withdraw. Shipping fees and taxes aren't modelled.

18+. Pack opening is chance-based spending with real money. Whatever the odds imply at the platform's own values, cash in hand is lower after the buyback haircut, fees and the gap to market prices. Only spend what you can afford to lose. See the DOPA! listing, other simulators, our guides on EV and buyback and the methodology.